Skip to main content
· 8/17/2007

Edwards v. Costner

Citations

  • 979 So. 2d 757
  • 2007 WL 2343706

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that although an intertwined-claims theory can apply when a nonsignatory attempts to claim the benefit of arbitration, it “is not applicable . . . when a signatory attempts to compel a nonsignatory third party to arbitrate claims it may have against a signatory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cobb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.