Skip to main content
· 2/11/1922

Edwards v. City of Neodesha

Citations

  • 110 Kan. 492
  • 204 P. 708
  • 1922 Kan. LEXIS 80

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>•Condemnation Proceedings — Motion to Dismiss Denied — Appeal Premarturely Taken. In. an appeal to the .district court from an award of damages for land condemned for a city water supply, certain part owners of the land taken, who had been omitted from the condemnation proceedings, were made parties to the action on their own motion, and after trial and verdict in their behalf the city filed two motions: (1) for a new trial, and (2) to dismiss the parties permitted to intervene. The motion for a new trial was granted and the motion to dismiss denied. Held, that the order • denying the motion to dismiss is not appealable until the final determination of the action in the trial court.</p>

Judges: Dawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.