Edwards v. Bringier Sugar Extracting Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that document need only satisfy one category to meet 1.4’s classification requirement
• holding that document need only satisfy one category to meet 1.4's classification requirement
• “When determining whether information was properly withheld under Exemption 1, the ‘only question for the Court is whether the disputed [information] is properly classified under the applicable Executive Order.’” (internal alterations omitted
• rejecting conclusory assertion that agency classified document to avoid embarrassment
• rejecting conclusory assertion that agency classified document to avoid embarrassment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).