· 3/30/2010
Edwards v. Board of Supervisors
Citations
- 229 P.3d 233
- 224 Ariz. 221
- 579 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 7
- 2010 Ariz. App. LEXIS 40
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that county established § 12-820.03’s “warning requirement” with uncontroverted evidence of a warning letter
- failure to request additional discovery under Rule 56(d) waives the issue
- applying Rule 56(f), the predecessor to current Rule 56(d)
- failure to request “a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or depositions to be taken or discovery to be had or . . . such other order as is just” pursuant to Rule 56(f) from the superior court resulted in waiver of the issue on appeal
- construing 56(f), predecessor to current Rule 56(d)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orozco, Norris, Weisberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.