Skip to main content
· 3/30/2010

Edwards v. Board of Supervisors

Citations

  • 229 P.3d 233
  • 224 Ariz. 221
  • 579 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 7
  • 2010 Ariz. App. LEXIS 40

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that county established § 12-820.03’s “warning requirement” with uncontroverted evidence of a warning letter
  • failure to request additional discovery under Rule 56(d) waives the issue
  • applying Rule 56(f), the predecessor to current Rule 56(d)
  • failure to request “a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or depositions to be taken or discovery to be had or . . . such other order as is just” pursuant to Rule 56(f) from the superior court resulted in waiver of the issue on appeal
  • construing 56(f), predecessor to current Rule 56(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orozco, Norris, Weisberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.