Edwards & Associates, Tim Edwards v. Azleway, Inc. and Gary Duke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant who explicitly affirmed fact before district court, had waived issue and could not \resurrect it on appeal\
• holding that \exchange\ between the prosecutor and defense counsel made \evident that the appellant intentionally relinquished\ claim
• holding that a defendant accepts the PSR when he declines to object
• explaining that once waived, a claim of error ordinarily may not be resurrected on appeal
• “waiver rule may ‘admit of an occasional exception’ in extraordinary circumstances”; see, e.g., Sindi v. El-Moslimany, 896 F.3d 1, 28 (lst Cir. 2018) (finding “exception to the raise-or-waive principle” based on various factors
• \[A] defendant who accepts the [PSR]'s configuration of the sentencing record can scarcely be heard to complain when the sentencing court uses those facts in making its findings.\ (cleaned up with new alterations added

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).