Edward Yashenko v. Harrah's Nc Casino Company, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff made a prima facie showing of retaliation based on the temporal proximity between his FMLA leave and termination
• holding that where employee was terminated due to a legitimate reason, he cannot show that he is entitled to reinstatement even if the employer otherwise interfered with his FMLA rights by denying leave
• holding that an employer does not interfere with the exercise of FMLA rights where it reorganizes during an employee’s leave and eliminates that employee’s position as a result of legitimate non-FMLA leave concerns
• holding that where employee was terminated due to a legitimate reason, he cannot 18 show that he is entitled to reinstatement even if the employer otherwise interfered with his FMLA rights by denying leave
• finding that taking FMLA leave constitutes protected activity for purposes of an FMLA retaliation claim
• stating that the FMLA provides a limited right to restoration to a prior employment position after taking qualifying leave

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).