Edward Vantine Studios, Inc. v. Fraternal Composite Service, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding promise to indemnify customer was tortious but “[i]f the contracts had been terminated by reason of better price, better service, or better quality alone, . . . the Court would not have determined there was a tortious interference with the contracts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).