Skip to main content
· 5/2/1986

Edward Rabatin v. Columbus Lines, Inc. And Union Carbide Corporation. Appeal of Columbus Lines, Inc

Citations

  • 790 F.2d 22
  • 1986 A.M.C. 2235

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a court may raise and decide the issue of venue sua sponte
  • “an action is commenced within the meaning of 23 § 405(g) when a complaint is filed with the court”
  • “[P]ro se litigants in the ordinary civil case should not be treated 23 more favorably than parties with attorneys of record.”
  • “Under Pennsylvania law, two actors are joint tortfeasors if their conduct “causes a single harm which cannot be apportioned ... even though [the actors] may have acted independently.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Gibbons, Hunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.