Skip to main content
· 8/26/2004

Edward R. Williams Angelynne Williams, H/w v. Philadelphia Housing Authority Police Department, Edward R. Williams

Citations

  • 380 F.3d 751
  • 15 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1607
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18151
  • 1 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) 11
  • 2004 WL 1903259

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a two-month gap between an employee’s protected activity and the employee’s termination alone did not establish sufficient prima facie causation
  • concluding that a gap of over two months to be insufficient alone to be “unduly suggestive” of retaliation
  • concluding that a gap of over two months, taken alone, is insufficient to be “unduly suggestive” of retaliation
  • concluding that a gap of over two months to be insufficient alone to be “unduly suggestive” of retaliation
  • concluding that a gap of over two months, taken alone, is insufficient to be “unduly suggestive” of retaliation
  • concluding that a gap of over two months is insufficient alone to be “unduly suggestive” of retaliation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nygaard, Fuentes, Stapleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.