Edward N. Sibley v. William L. Ball, Iii, Etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “when a suit against the Secretary of the Army, or the Navy, seeks a money judgment, it is in substance a suit against the United States”
• transferring to Federal Circuit case for backpay because within purview of “Little Tucker Act”
• transferring to Federal Circuit case for back-pay because within purview of “Little Tucker Act”
• transferring to Federal Circuit case for backpay because within purview of \Little Tucker Act\
• APA waives sovereign immunity for suits challenging agency actions but excludes suits seeking money judgments
• “[B]ecause women are disproportionately victims of rape and sexual 1 victims of mild forms of sexual harassment may understandably worry whether a harasser's 2 conduct is merely a prelude to violent sexual assault.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).