EDWARD M. COHON & ASSOCS., LTD. v. First Nat. Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• existence of intent to defraud under the Mechanics' Lien Act (Ill.Rev.Stat.1989, ch. 82, par. 1 et seq.) is a question for the trier of fact
• existence of intent to defraud under the Mechanics’ Lien Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 82, par. 1 et seq.) is a question for the trier of fact
• “A trial court’s construction of an oral agreement between the parties will be followed unless it is against the manifest weight of the evidence and an opposite conclusion is clearly warranted.”
• existence of intent to defraud under the Mechanics’ Lien Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 82, par. 1 et seq. ) is a question for the trier of fact
• \A trial court's construction of an oral agreement between the parties will be followed unless it is against the manifest weight of the evidence and an opposite conclusion is clearly warranted.\
• \A trial court's construction of an oral agreement between the parties will be followed unless it is against the manifest weight of the evidence and an opposite conclusion is clearly warranted.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).