Edward M. Chadbourne, Inc. v. Van Dyke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that introduction of evidence that lead driver was negligent in causing rear-end collision raises a question of comparative fault to be resolved by the jury, notwithstanding the presumption of negligence that might have attached to rear driver
• explaining that introduction of evidence that lead driver was negligent in causing reár-end collision raises a question of comparative fault to be resolved by the jury, notwithstanding the presumption of negligence that might have attached to following driver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).