Edward L. STEVENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC., Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal for failure to prosecute where plaintiff, among other missteps, failed to retain counsel after being twice instructed to do so by the district court, and further failed to provide a satisfactory explanation as to why he was unable to retain an attorney
• “Since the plaintiff in this case did appear for his deposition (though he then refused to answer any questions), we conclude that dismissal under Rule 37(d) would not have been appropriate.”
• deponent was plaintiff in employment discrimination suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).