Skip to main content
· 2/1/1994

Edward L. Peltier v. Larry Wright, Warden

Citations

  • 15 F.3d 860
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 737
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 1255
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1476
  • 1994 WL 24217

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that generally federal habeas corpus is unavailable for alleged errors in interpretation and application of state law
  • explaining that a federal writ of habeas corpus “is unavailable for 22 alleged error in the interpretation or application of state law”
  • noting that generally federal habeas 4|| corpus is unavailable for alleged errors in interpretation and application of state law
  • noting that generally federal habeas corpus is unavailable 2 for alleged errors in interpretation and application of state law
  • “Idaho’s interpretation of whether the state judge’s order constituted a withholding of judgment or a sentence is a question of state law,” and “there is no … subterfuge here.”
  • “Idaho’s interpretation of whether the state judge’s order constituted a withholding of judgment or a sentence is a question of state law” and “[t]here is no such subterfuge here”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Choy, Goodwin, Skopil, Circuit'

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.