Skip to main content
· 6/25/1985

Edward L. Greenblatt v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Incorporated

Citations

  • 763 F.2d 1352
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30716
  • 54 U.S.L.W. 2033

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an arbitration decision may have “col- lateral estoppel effect” if it “affords basic elements of adjudicatory procedure, such as an opportunity for presentation of evidence”
  • giving an arbitration award preclusive effect where both parties were represented by counsel, made opening and closing arguments, and were permitted to examine and cross-examine witnesses and present relevant evidence
  • arbitration proceeding given collateral estoppel effect in subsequent securities suit because the appellant had full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue
  • “[T]he determination of issues in an arbitration proceeding should generally be treated as conclusive in subsequent proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roney, Hill, Tuttle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.