Edward L. Collins, II v. Robert Bender Stephen D'Erchia Richard Plunkett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that illegal search of employee’s home was not a personnel action so Bivens claim was not precluded
• finding the district court's dismissal improper when the CSRA's definition of \personnel action\ did not cover the conduct at issue
• discussing whether the complained-of action was connected with, or merely tangential to, a “personnel action” under CSRA
• finding the district court’s dismissal improper when the CSRA’s definition of “personnel action” did not cover the conduct at issue
• the CSRA did not preempt a claim regarding a warrantless search of a plaintiff-employee's home
• “[E]ven if no remedy were available to [Mahtesian] under the CSRA, he still could not bring [his] action if the acts complained of fell within the CSRA’s confines.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).