Skip to main content
· 1/7/1976

Edward Kuhn v. National Association of Letter Carriers, Branch 5

Citations

  • 528 F.2d 767
  • 91 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a union representing letter carriers owed no duty to a postal employee who served as a janitor
  • concluding that a union representing letter carriers owed no duty to a postal employee who served as a janitor
  • fact that plaintiff was denied administrative hearing because of late filings is no bar to exhaustion rule
  • dismissing discharged postal employee's claim against Postal Service
  • dismissing discharged postal employee’s claim against Postal Service

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heaney, Bright, Henley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.