Edward Krecioch v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that eligibility for EAJA fees requires that (1) the plaintiff was the “prevailing party”; (2) the government’s position was not “substantially justified”; (3) “no special circumstances make the award unjust”; and (4) the request is timely made
• finding the Government’s position to be substantially justified in part because it was “supported by precedent from other federal circuits”
• finding the Government’s position to be substantially justified in part because it was “sup- No. 06-2441 5 ported by precedent from other federal circuits”
• noting that a paralegal’s time is compensable under the EAJA
• “[A]ttorney’s fees are not available for pro se litigants under the EAJA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).