Edward J. Barry v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting a test for the public disturbance requirement of a general riot statute that evaluates whether a disturbance affects the public
• D.C. general riot statute was designed to be an \all-encompassing statute\ that includes incidents in jails
• habeas petitioner not entitled to hearing on allegations “essentially predicated on conjecture and speculation”
• timeliness requirement for recusal motions under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 144

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).