Skip to main content
· 2/16/2022

Edward Harral Roberts v. Carmen S. Lopez Roberts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “intentional interference with the plaintiffs business, in the absence of any legal justification, was malicious in law and entitled the plaintiff to damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.