Edward G. Rizk v. J. Cary Gray, Individually and as Independent and President of Rizk Interest, Ltd and Rizk Interest, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court’s “failure to sua sponte strike” certain statements from the opening statement and closing argument of the plaintiff’s counsel “was not error, let alone plain error”
• concluding that the trial court’s “failure to sua sponte strike” certain statements from the opening statement and closing argument of the plaintiff’s counsel “was not error, let alone plain error”
• concluding that the trial court’s “failure to sua sponte strike” certain statements from the opening statement and closing argument of the plaintiff’s counsel “was not error, let alone plain error”
• stating defendant waived argument when failed to make it during trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).