· 9/27/2004
Edward Franklin v. City of Evanston
Citations
- 384 F.3d 838
- 21 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1448
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20311
- 94 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 921
- 2004 WL 2153867
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that, to make out prima facie case for equal protection violation, plaintiff may not rely on disparate impact claim but must show defendant acted with discriminatory intent
- finding no violation of the IHRA where an employee was terminated after an arrest for possession of marijuana because possession violated his employer’s workplace policies, not merely for the fact he was arrested
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cudahy, Posner, Rovner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.