Skip to main content
· 9/27/2004

Edward Franklin v. City of Evanston

Citations

  • 384 F.3d 838
  • 21 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1448
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20311
  • 94 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 921
  • 2004 WL 2153867

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, to make out prima facie case for equal protection violation, plaintiff may not rely on disparate impact claim but must show defendant acted with discriminatory intent
  • finding no violation of the IHRA where an employee was terminated after an arrest for possession of marijuana because possession violated his employer’s workplace policies, not merely for the fact he was arrested

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Posner, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.