Skip to main content
· 5/15/1989

Edward E. Pinkham v. Maine Central Railroad Company

Citations

  • 874 F.2d 875
  • 28 Fed. R. Serv. 241
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6525
  • 1989 WL 49335

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • exclusion of evidence concerning fact already established by unrebutted evidence was harmless because the evidence was cumulative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bownes, Coffin, Fuste

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.