Edward Dewayne Brockman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding impeachment with prior inconsistent statement was improper where State called witness despite fact that witness had repudiated his prior statement before trial and had been uncooperative during proffer
• “When determining prejudice, appellate courts may look at whether the State compounded the error by relying on the evidence in final argument.”
• “When determining prejudice, appellate courts may look whether the State compounded the error by relying on the evidence in final argument. This applies regardless of whether there is a separate objection to the use of the evidence in final argument.”
• ‘When determining prejudice, appellate courts may look whether the State compounded the error by relying on the evidence in final argument. This applies regardless of whether there is a separate objection to the use of the evidence in final argument.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).