Edward D. Meehan, Jr. v. Tiger Analytics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \procedural due process in the administrative setting does not always require application of the judicial model\
• holding that a driver’s license could be suspended before a hearing where the driver had a poor driving record and post-deprivation review was available
• concluding that additional procedures were unnecessary because the factual basis for taking away the plaintiffs driver’s license was undisputed, and the state authorities would have had to depart from binding regulations to change the decision
• noting that a written objection by the license holder would suffice to bring mistake to the secretary’s attention
• concluding that additional procedures were unnecessary because the factual basis for taking away the plaintiff’s driver’s license was undisputed, and the state authorities would have had to depart from binding regulations to change the decision
• holding that a post depravation hearing is sufficient when the state’s interest in the safety of its highways is substantial and risk of erroneous is low because the suspension is based on the number of traffic violations accrued

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).