Edward B. Hager v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that one year of unsupervised probation and $75,000 fine did not constitute a continuing collateral consequence of conviction
• explaining that courts will use the writ of error coram nobis “to set aside a criminal judgment only under circumstances compelling such action to achieve justice” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• explaining that courts will use the writ of error coram nobis \to set aside a criminal judgment only under circumstances compelling such action to achieve justice\ (internal -12- quotation marks omitted)
• petitioner must demonstrate “significant collateral consequences from the judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).