Edward Alan Hill v. Anthony J. Brigano, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s statement was not barred by Edwards, despite impermissible interrogation the night before, because defendant had night alone in cell and defendant was aware of his right to have an attorney
• holding that defendant's statement was not barred by Edwards, despite impermissible interrogation the night before, because defendant had night alone in cell and defendant was aware of his right to have an attorney
• holding that defendant's statement was not barred by Edwards, despite impermissible interrogation the night before, because defendant had night alone in cell and defendant was aware of his right to have an attorney
• previous waivers can show understanding of the nature and import of rights, making subsequent statements knowing, voluntary, and intelligent
• “It is not enough for the defendant to show that the decision to exclude the two jurors was improper. He also must show that the jury selected was biased.”
• “It is not enough for the defendant to show that the decision to exclude the two jurors was improper. He also must show that the jury selected was biased.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).