Edward A. Murillo v. Matthew J. Frank, Secretary, Wisconsin Department of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the brevity of the State’s argument for harmlessness “makes it impossible [for the court] to say that the [erroneously admitted] statement . . . was unlikely to have had a substantial and injurious effect on the verdict”
• noting that Crawford “jettisoned” the previous standard
• noting that Crawford “jettisoned” the previous standard
• no social science verification of the proposition that emotionality enhances the reliability of a statement
• alleged violations of the Confrontation Clause are subject to harmless error analy- sis
• Crawford “assuredly (and explicitly) jettisoned the Roberts standard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).