Skip to main content
· 4/22/2024

Eduardo Palomo Medina v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A district court certainly retains the power to preclude closing arguments on defense theories that are not supported by the evidence.”
  • “Judicial estoppel prevents a party from taking a contrary position ‘where a party assumes a certain position in a legal proceeding, and succeeds in maintaining that position.’ ” (quoting New Hamp- shire v. Maine, 532 U.S. 742, 749 (2001))
  • “[S]uch an error is structural and requires reversal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.