EDUARDO HUDGENS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the trial court’s denial of a motion for a new trial when attorneys’ questioning was imprecise and not designed to elicit the type of information that was supposedly concealed
• “As to the juror with a common name, there was insufficient proof that she was the same person who was involved in all of the prior civil cases.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).