Eduardo Hill and Sharon Thompson Hill, Cross v. McDermott Inc., Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that relief is available for an “obvious error of law, apparent on the record,” such as a decision that “conflicts with a clear statutory mandate” or “involves a fundamental misconception of the law” (citations omitted)
• explaining that relief is available for an “obvious error of law, apparent on the record,” such as a decision that “conflicts with a clear statutory mandate” or “involves a fundamental misconception of the law” (citations omitted)
• explaining that relief is available for an “obvious error of law, apparent on the record,” such as a decision that “conflicts with a clear statutory mandate” or “involves a fundamental misconception of the law” (citations omitted)
• “A judgment is void on jurisdictional grounds if the [district] court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter or over the parties.”
• “A judgment is void on jurisdictional grounds if the court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter or over the parties.”
• “[A] Rule 60(b)(1) motion filed within the time for appeal saves the parties and the court the time and expense of a needless appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).