EDRO Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the plaintiff could not meet Listing 1.04A where she did not point to “positive straight leg tests in both the sitting and supine positions”
• finding the plaintiff could not meet Listing 1.04A where she did not point to “positive straight leg tests in both the sitting and supine positions”
• finding the plaintiff could not meet Listing 1.04A where she did not point to “positive straight leg tests in both the sitting and supine positions”
• the plaintiff could not meet Listing 1.04 where she did “not point to any positive straight leg raising tests in both the sitting and supine positions”
• the plaintiff could 23 not meet Listing 1.04 where she did “not point to any positive straight leg raising tests in both the sitting and supine positions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).