Edo Corporation v. Beech Aircraft Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting Kansas law to require “clear and convincing evidence,” and holding that “[e]vidence of vague, indefinite, or ambiguous statements will not suffice”
• oral assurances of a continuing relationship insufficient to alter written terms permitting termination of contract for convenience

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).