Edna L. HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that if the contingency agreement authorizes an award that is less than twice the “standard rate” of counsel, it is not a windfall
• observing that effective hourly 13 rates must be higher than normal in Social Security cases given the risks inherent to such cases
• explaining that its “multiplier” rule emerged from a desire to ensure that social security benefits attorneys were adequately compensated when “averaged over many cases”
• explaining that its “multiplier” rule emerged from a desire to ensure that social security benefits attorneys were adequately compensated when “averaged over many cases”
• explaining that its “multiplier” rule emerged from a desire to ensure that social security benefits attorneys were adequately compensated when “averaged over many cases”
• expressing dismay over the continuing \confusion\ in the lower courts in determining the existence of a windfall

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).