Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a denial of a Rule 60(b) motion when counsel had overlooked a statute that would have allowed a larger interest award than the judgment provided
• holding such conduct not cognizable grounds for relief
• “[A] lawyer’s ignorance or carelessness do [sic] not present cognizable grounds for relief under [Rule] 60(b).” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[A] lawyer’s ignorance or carelessness do not present cognizable grounds for relief under 60(b).”
• “[A] lawyer’s ignorance or carelessness do not present 4 Liu does not seek reconsideration of this Court’s judgment as it relates to his constitutional and Section 1981 claims for money damages. 6 cognizable grounds for relief under 60(b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).