· 1/29/1986
Edna Johnson v. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Citations
- 783 F.2d 59
- 39 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1822
- 4 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 388
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21553
- 39 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,911
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The general rule is that a prior arbitration should not, and indeed must not, be given preclusive effect in a subsequent Title VII suit . . . or a Section 1983 suit[.]”
- requiring statement of objection in motion for directed verdict
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cummings, Bauer, Campbell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.