Skip to main content
· 1/29/1986

Edna Johnson v. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Citations

  • 783 F.2d 59
  • 39 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1822
  • 4 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 388
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21553
  • 39 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,911

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The general rule is that a prior arbitration should not, and indeed must not, be given preclusive effect in a subsequent Title VII suit . . . or a Section 1983 suit[.]”
  • requiring statement of objection in motion for directed verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Bauer, Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.