Edna Acosta-Sepulveda v. Pedro Hernandez-Purcell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• listing Loudermill entitlements and observing that “it is not required that a hearing be conducted before an ‘impartial decisionmaker’”
• “Contrary to the district court’s premise, it is not required that a hearing be conducted before an impartial decisionmaker.”
• “In fact, the hearing may be presided over by the employer himself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).