Edmunson v. Department of Insurance & Finance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that challenge to superseded rules was moot, because new rule reflected present law
• concluding that challenge to superseded rules was moot, because new rule reflected present law
• “[A] challenge to the validity of an expired or superseded rule is not ‘kept alive’ for mootness purposes by the fact that the superseded rule may have some continu- ing effect on the application or validity of a current rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).