· 5/3/2006
Edmunds v. Kraner
Citations
- 136 P.3d 338
- 142 Idaho 867
- 2006 Ida. LEXIS 71
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In an era of burgeoning case loads and [crowded] dockets, effective case management has become an essential tool for handling civil litigation.”
- “The purpose of our discovery rules is to facilitate fair and expedient pretrial fact gathering.”
- “The purpose of our discovery rules is to facilitate fair and expedient pretrial fact gathering. It follows, therefore, that discovery rules are not intended to encourage or reward those whose conduct is inconsistent with that purpose.”
- “Idaho law specifically contemplates that expert testimony can change after the initial disclosure.”
- discussing the same purposes for the civil rules governing discovery
- discussing similar rules applicable to civil cases
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burdick, Schroeder, Eismann, Jones, Kidwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.