Edmundo M. Campos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming that a “bare detainer letter alone does not sufficiently place an alien in INS custody to make habeas corpus available”
• “the bare detainer letter alone 2 does not sufficiently place [a non-citizen] in INS custody to make habeas corpus 3 available”
• “‘[T]he bare detainer letter alone does not sufficiently place an alien in INS custody 13 to make habeas corpus available.’”
• a detainer letter alone does not place a prisoner in ICE custody for habeas purposes
• 225 makes ___ clear that 242(i) does not place any obligations on the government
• overruling prior Ninth Circuit cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).