Skip to main content
· 3/6/2015

Edmonds v. Engility Corporation

Citations

  • 82 F. Supp. 3d 337
  • 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27360
  • 2015 WL 1011857

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that courts “generally apply the burden-shifting analysis set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. to Title VII, FMLA and DCFMLA claims”
  • finding that terminating employees “as part of the company’s larger reorganization” was a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for terminating plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Christopher R. Cooper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.