Edmonds v. Department of Public Safety

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a challenge to a charging document raised in a habeas petition should have been raised on direct appeal or in a postconviction motion
• “Habeas corpus may not be used to file successive 3.850 motions or to raise issues which would be untimely if considered as a motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850.” (citing Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236, 1245-46 (Fla.2004))
• \Habeas corpus may not be used to file successive 3.850 motions or to raise issues which would be untimely if considered as a motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850.\ (citing Baker v. State , 878 So.2d 1236 , 1245-46 (Fla. 2004) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).