Edmonds Institute v. U.S. Dep't of Interior

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Exemption 5 applied where , “disclosure of material considered for but not utilized in” public reports “would reveal the editorial judgment of’ agency staff (citation omitted)
• concluding that, if “information that was considered for inclusion in the [final report] but ultimately did not make its way into” the final report was disclosed, the agency’s “editorial judgment” would be revealed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).