Edmond v. United States Attorney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that there was a lack of malicious motive in the defendant’s request for a stay of the proceedings
• noting the government had identified thirty-one requests before the plaintiff’s in the queue
• ‘It is well settled that Vaughn Indexes are generally unavailable until after the agency has decided the extent of disclosure.”
• “Plaintiff’s request for a Vaughn Index is premature since the government has not yet processed Plaintiff’s FOIA request and has not determined the extent of disclosure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).