Edmiston v. Kupsenel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in ordering remittitur of a verdict wherein the awarded damages were thirty-one times greater than economic damages
• the court reversed the trial court’s granting of remittitur where the court found the sum awarded not to be “conscience shocking” as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).