Edmark Indus. Sdn. Bhd. v. SOUTH ASIA INT'L (HK)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• both holding that statements were literally false where the evidence showed that the defendant = s products did not have all the features they were advertised to have

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).