Edmands v. Cuno, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that franchisee in addition to acting as sales representative for franchisor distributed products directly to customers at prices franchisee set
• plaintiff admitted in answer to counterclaim that he and corporate entity were liable
• \The plaintiffs have neither asserted nor provided us with any authority that the designation of Edmands as an individual 'doing business as' Eastern precludes Edmands' personal liability. Our research suggests a contrary rule.\
• decision to submit to jury claim alleging violation of Connecticut Franchise Act
• decision to submit to jury claim alleging violation of Connecticut Franchise Act
• “Because . . . [the relevant acts] conformed in all respects to the express terms of the parties’ 5 agreements, we, therefore, have great difficulty identifying the wrong [under CUTPA] the plaintiffs seek to assert.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).