District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/30/1993
Edler v. State
Citations
- 616 So. 2d 546
- 1993 WL 88656
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the argument that the doctrine may not be applied where the intended as well as the \supposedly\ unintended victim is harmed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Palmer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-09-01· cited 230×
- Provenzano v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-10-16· cited 65×
- People v. CzaharaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-08-26· cited 55×
- People v. BirreutaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-12-05· cited 42×
- State v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-03-01· cited 17×
- Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1962-05-09· cited 15×
- Brooks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-22· cited 10×
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-15· cited 9×
- Battles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-12-12· cited 4×
- Maeweather v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-06-02· cited 3×
- Maeweather v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-02-11· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.