Skip to main content
· 1/19/2005

Edison Gishta Manjola Gishta Enea Gishta v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General

Citations

  • 404 F.3d 972
  • 121 F. App'x 585
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 5681

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a BIA decision that adopts and affirms pursuant to Burbano “demonstrates that the board independently reviewed the case.”
  • holding that a BIA decision that adopts and affirms an IJ’s decision “demonstrates that the board independently reviewed the case”
  • denying a due process argument based on interpreter error because the issue was raised “for the first time in their administrative appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merritt, Gibbons, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.