Skip to main content
· 2/6/1904

Edinburgh Lombard Investment Co. v. Cooper

Citations

  • 68 Kan. 517
  • 75 P. 488
  • 1904 Kan. LEXIS 136

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Practice, Supreme Court — Jurisdiction—Amount in Controversy. Plaintiff recovered from defendants a judgment for . $515.66, with interest at ten per cent, per annum, costs of suit, and foreclosure of its mortgage. Defendants filed a motion to correct the journal entry. The motion was sustained and plaintiff’s recovery was reduced to the extent of the interest and costs. This proceeding is brought to the supreme court by .plaintiff to review said order. Held, that the amount in controversy was the loss of the interest sustained by plaintiff in the correction of the journal entry, and, being less than $100, the supreme court has no : jurisdiction to review the case.</p>

Judges: Atkinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.